<\/p>\n
Moroccan archaeologist Abdeljalil Bouzouggar is calling for a reassessment of the country\u2019s prehistoric eras, arguing that long-standing classifications shaped by European perspectives no longer reflect recent discoveries.<\/p>\n
In a new article published by the Royal Anthropological Institute of Britain and Ireland, Bouzouggar and a team of international researchers reassess 25 years of archaeological data from Morocco. The paper, \u201cReevaluating Prehistory in Morocco from the Middle to the Upper Paleolithic,\u201d<\/em> was co-authored with Nick Barton and Stacey Carolin of Oxford University and Louise Humphrey of London\u2019s Natural History Museum.<\/p>\n Bouzouggar, director of Morocco\u2019s National Institute of Archaeology and Heritage Sciences, said prehistoric terminology in Morocco has often been borrowed from European models, particularly French.<\/p>\n \u201cDue to historical and linguistic reasons, the names of some prehistoric periods in Morocco were linked to what happened in Europe,\u201d he said. \u201cThis Euro-Asian-centered tendency was prominent. But to be fair, I cannot generalize.\u201d<\/p>\n The study revisits the link between the Mousterian and Aterian stone tool traditions, once thought to represent separate eras. \u201cYears later it became clear that the Mousterian and Aterian belong to the same period, though their relationship is not yet fully understood,\u201d Bouzouggar said.<\/p>\n Dating methods have also complicated Morocco\u2019s prehistoric timeline. Until 2003, the Aterian was believed to span 40,000 to 20,000 years ago, based on carbon dating. But more advanced techniques, such as electron spin resonance on gazelle teeth from a cave near Tangier, suggest the Aterian may date back more than 150,000 years.<\/p>\n That finding prompted wider use of multiple dating techniques to resolve gaps between the Middle and Upper Paleolithic. \u201cExcavation methods and dating techniques from the 1950s created a gap of thousands of years,\u201d Bouzouggar said.<\/p>\n \u201cNow we have identified a culture between these two periods, dated roughly between 27,000 and 23,000 years ago. We will need to give it a name.\u201d<\/p>\n Bouzouggar praised younger researchers for advancing the field. \u201cMany students at our institute and other universities are quietly doing groundbreaking work on stone tools, fauna, human remains, and resource use,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n \u201cThis generation will speak out and show that Morocco\u2019s history is truly extraordinary.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n Rephrase in a different way as if you were a native American speaker as a content creation expert and do not talk about yourself or your experience in the text and do not show yourself as an artificial intelligence who wrote and fill the bullet point in the topic and speak the heart of the topic itself and dont take date of blog in ther first and dont take text like box of newsliter subscribe on post from content and romove all linke insert in content and and remove all affiliate disclosure phrases on content like this “This post may contain Amazon or other affiliate links that allow us to earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Please see our Disclosure Policy for more info” and “#” put in its place bullet point, and romove name of the web site or his links we are take a content from our new creation, and don’t publish clone new content more than just one time<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Moroccan archaeologist Abdeljalil Bouzouggar is calling for a reassessment of the country\u2019s prehistoric eras, arguing that long-standing classifications shaped by European perspectives no longer reflect recent discoveries. In a new article published by the Royal Anthropological Institute of Britain and Ireland, Bouzouggar and a team of international researchers reassess 25 years of archaeological data from […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":9881,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_lock_modified_date":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[940,3092,3096,3097,1182,9204,234,3095,256,3093,3925,9203,3088,3094,5646,3098,2920],"class_list":["post-9880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-culture","tag-american","tag-characters","tag-content","tag-creation","tag-dont","tag-eras","tag-experience","tag-expert","tag-moroccos","tag-native","tag-prehistoric","tag-reevaluation","tag-rephrase","tag-speaker","tag-study","tag-talk","tag-urges"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9880"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9880\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9882,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9880\/revisions\/9882"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9881"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alfanouscar.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}